{"id":"W2913662926","doi":"10.14531/ss2005.4.72-76","title":"PERIPROSTHETIC BONE DENSITY CHANGES EVALUATION USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russian Journal of Spine Surgery (Khirurgiya Pozvonochnika)","topic":"Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Biocompatibility; Implant; Titanium; Biomedical engineering; Materials science; Periprosthetic; Quantitative computed tomography; Computed tomography; Tomography; Dentistry; Bone density; Medicine; Radiology; Surgery; Osteoporosis; Arthroplasty; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004874464,0.0002774434,0.0002389412,0.0007349349,0.0001161935,0.0002375349,0.0001553829,0.0003223231,0.001597184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006529746,0.0002398206,0.0002436725,0.0002454514,0.0003248543,0.0001891301,0.0001299923,0.0002899852,0.0002421252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001178569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001467967,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005861159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009747852,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997289,0.00005414684,0.00002627646,0.00002962902,0.0001318449,0.00002931996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995092,0.0001223472,0.0001724027,0.00002989863,0.0001351981,0.00003094696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001840567,0.0002221976,0.03553828,0.0002329204,0.00005045954,0.001270127,0.0002059296,0.0002175978,0.9410522,0.00006702716,0.00005960303,0.01924305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008492066,0.007221268,0.5592215,0.00006497601,0.0002741827,0.0143836,0.0005690063,0.002096541,0.4130931,0.0001392134,0.0028089,0.00004275017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934605,0.001977272,0.003403674,0.00002676235,0.000008060504,0.00004096414,0.00009577304,0.0000270495,0.0009598825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950448,0.0008545072,0.002683847,0.00002302721,0.000007780469,0.00003683804,0.000167902,0.00000706043,0.001174262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001597184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005343139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03485097376323893,"score_gpt":0.2863848894294201,"score_spread":0.2515339156661812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}