{"id":"W2913755769","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.13143","title":"Plant geographic origin and phylogeny as potential drivers of community structure in root‐inhabiting fungi","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Algoma University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Guelph","keywords":"Biology; Host (biology); Plant community; Phylogenetics; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Community structure; Botany; Relative species abundance; Species richness","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007345334,0.0002503719,0.0003716642,0.0009150312,0.0003726523,0.0007027682,0.0002583828,0.0003518063,0.001013094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001763276,0.0001957346,0.0002460573,0.000689199,0.0005112689,0.0005768178,0.0006204105,0.0003321116,0.0001071268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002686567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001964297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002542845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005002918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995784,0.0001293782,0.00002469853,0.0001615615,0.00004953975,0.00005634958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969363,0.001176192,0.00109895,0.000149114,0.0003116544,0.000327834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002072653,0.00004798775,0.9017273,0.0001141754,0.0001515753,0.0001430486,0.0004399645,0.0008878268,0.09114932,0.000238265,0.00005564393,0.004837533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003008103,0.00004616248,0.9971545,0.000005289681,0.00001732998,0.00006411874,0.0002178745,0.001675618,0.0006193152,0.00009683295,0.00009501022,0.000004936231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990965,0.0001702835,0.0004941626,0.000009752047,9.936505e-7,0.000003458233,0.00008792886,0.000005047449,0.000131978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996102,0.00002329359,0.0002836906,0.000003060945,0.000001305569,0.000002033027,0.00004123855,0.000001272448,0.00003385391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002542845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005056083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007383584650468815,"score_gpt":0.2075624449107307,"score_spread":0.2001788602602619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}