{"id":"W2913947001","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/gvr7y","title":"Understanding collaborative approaches to research: A synthesis of the research partnership literature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Engineering ethics; Management science; Political science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1588552,0.00144734,0.003087573,0.03737623,0.01293688,0.03775045,0.003830973,0.004624594,0.003442899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2046836,0.001311494,0.002150198,0.04624479,0.01441911,0.02328821,0.01420964,0.004365587,0.0003677451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0546553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.164327,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.136516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2453145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8905732,0.06810565,0.01445563,0.006115207,0.01696571,0.003784625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7004648,0.2433944,0.0117189,0.006875928,0.03465053,0.00289548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002151297,0.0001167664,0.006660661,0.07914224,0.0006945248,0.001097856,0.4265631,0.001114487,0.001330744,0.1677594,0.01005743,0.3052477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001009447,0.0001640091,0.01116724,0.1434906,0.001675985,0.0008308698,0.4567558,0.001371828,0.001208109,0.09656108,0.2864865,0.0001869446],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04819877,0.7396958,0.07458205,0.08329201,0.001724846,0.003874411,0.001325136,0.0001781466,0.04712887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5018679,0.367937,0.1118501,0.009592909,0.0004810798,0.005275796,0.0007307431,0.0001425553,0.002121969],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8401165,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7926587396929876,"score_gpt":0.5311719087284376,"score_spread":0.2614868309645501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}