{"id":"W2914385241","doi":"10.1037/apl0000396","title":"An eye for an eye? A meta-analysis of negative reciprocity in organizations.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Applied Psychology","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; PsycINFO; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Social psychology; Perception; Cynicism; MEDLINE; Chemistry; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04222484,0.001766292,0.007286535,0.008486977,0.0008348778,0.003884375,0.00244808,0.001550506,0.002926973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1187741,0.001034094,0.02309743,0.008360533,0.00120773,0.003053667,0.002401108,0.002569374,0.0002691641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003147382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004317059,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009862434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0193036,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9672235,0.02023651,0.006624447,0.002957073,0.002556722,0.0004016817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8677373,0.1097056,0.01293739,0.004627087,0.004088243,0.0009043516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000914294,0.00004165026,0.02173823,0.180985,0.7738814,0.0001639904,0.0008794802,0.0004098035,0.0001927737,0.0006244143,0.001375475,0.01879345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004176685,0.0002818558,0.01802421,0.03880561,0.9341924,0.0001828552,0.0004309868,0.0003176125,0.0002327661,0.001304082,0.005760922,0.00004903631],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02033433,0.9722572,0.002404245,0.001323728,0.0002802407,0.0005082121,0.001961116,0.00005777421,0.0008730828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5985112,0.3832749,0.008632061,0.002966766,0.0003040513,0.002324331,0.003344664,0.0001132009,0.0005287629],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04222484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.223309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1342141628153173,"score_gpt":0.4227063788813022,"score_spread":0.288492216065985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}