{"id":"W2914538745","doi":"10.1139/gen-2018-0066","title":"Forensic botany and forensic chemistry working together: application of plant DNA barcoding as a complement to forensic chemistry—a case study in Brazil","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genome","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; DNA barcoding; Crime scene; Forensic toxicology; Biology; Chemistry; Evolutionary biology; Archaeology; Geography; Chromatography; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001781172,0.0007325627,0.0003901074,0.00134874,0.004139123,0.001488217,0.001271086,0.00282622,0.001891623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049071,0.0004269665,0.0006284704,0.0008189642,0.002309426,0.001083234,0.002163714,0.001793416,0.0002780691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002139418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002314958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0236657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04798747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986138,0.0005670788,0.00008978856,0.0001668139,0.0003024645,0.0002599759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984307,0.0005518799,0.000308769,0.0001319722,0.0002127403,0.0003639795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001364711,0.0006417295,0.1014168,0.0005863698,0.00008316469,0.7163252,0.04699989,0.0008346221,0.01301386,0.008896859,0.00436276,0.1067023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003593705,0.0005178651,0.07977542,0.001199239,0.0001566058,0.7678419,0.05785115,0.003681167,0.009398545,0.009096703,0.07031701,0.0001284327],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501213,0.006449352,0.009839956,0.01357283,0.0001763668,0.0002868286,0.0001419256,0.0000578243,0.01935365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866359,0.003016748,0.005974032,0.001357895,0.00005644889,0.00002876239,0.00003629647,0.00002663054,0.002867366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0236657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0470559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01979106294085492,"score_gpt":0.2755483496312019,"score_spread":0.255757286690347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}