{"id":"W2914645669","doi":"10.1080/00949655.2019.1577858","title":"A comparison of the type I error rates of three assessment methods for indirect effects","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Mathematics; Type I and type II errors; Sobel test; Sample size determination; Monte Carlo method; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Standard error; Mediation; Variable (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00476444,0.00006043303,0.0004269879,0.0001935761,0.00004589265,0.00003379625,0.0001343399,0.00003999163,0.00002219167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03306309,0.00003391234,0.00006405059,0.0005547907,0.00004982548,0.00008453475,0.00003185245,0.0001009147,3.633697e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001434761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005462076,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001842935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.284468e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978098,0.000676129,0.0008700955,0.0001010906,0.000473895,0.00006899505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9166096,0.08128665,0.001163285,0.00007827015,0.0008281701,0.00003397721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001510419,0.00006335907,0.3259609,0.00006425006,0.00003201784,1.198415e-7,0.0002116771,0.2756848,0.001146886,0.002492205,0.0000772004,0.3941156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003369031,0.0003570566,0.4199601,0.00002241018,0.00001745752,7.129405e-7,0.000072253,0.526204,0.0001964637,0.05277822,0.00003329586,0.00002107741],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3745585,0.00007081535,0.6247724,0.00003932053,0.0003525891,0.000144819,0.000002822156,0.000001241018,0.00005745526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6019065,6.499571e-7,0.3980646,0.00001036003,0.00001091885,2.548902e-7,5.960513e-7,0.000001973766,0.000004201107],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3940945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9750818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5210559970260837,"score_gpt":0.6338973903667614,"score_spread":0.1128413933406777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}