{"id":"W2914852469","doi":"10.1111/conl.12634","title":"Should potential for climate change refugia be mainstreamed into the criteria for describing EBSAs?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Refugium (fishkeeping); Identification (biology); Biodiversity; Scope (computer science); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003460347,0.0001354006,0.0001197207,0.0000229842,0.0002887125,0.00009721894,0.0002143364,0.00006230357,0.004823905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004716956,0.0001102746,0.0001036282,0.0001233659,0.000122296,0.0002947739,0.00009098765,0.00005866014,0.0001878069],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002678412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004178565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001469263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001458124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998963,0.00003423336,0.0002015021,0.0002808619,0.0001779815,0.0003423998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994806,0.00009114308,0.0001057776,0.0002481924,0.00002259746,0.00005169489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004530363,0.00009933979,0.05137473,0.0001772623,0.00004310988,0.000002674019,0.003477106,0.00004170728,0.6199124,0.006264744,0.3114114,0.006742399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003608192,0.0002113445,0.1956973,0.00006994502,0.0001070353,0.000009202579,0.004952158,0.01344435,0.008589529,0.0002605057,0.7722626,0.0007877671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8985605,0.00001126158,0.002440725,0.0965836,0.0005651306,0.001194585,0.0001538245,0.0000567414,0.0004336839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9222595,0.00002080821,0.001021342,0.07523704,0.0001423082,0.000631899,0.0005073036,0.00002542793,0.0001543862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6113229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1028705607521966,"score_gpt":0.2945177494235709,"score_spread":0.1916471886713743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}