{"id":"W2914852469","doi":"10.1111/conl.12634","title":"Should potential for climate change refugia be mainstreamed into the criteria for describing EBSAs?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Refugium (fishkeeping); Identification (biology); Biodiversity; Scope (computer science); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01930662,0.0005835707,0.001168885,0.004253868,0.004556453,0.00699865,0.005002774,0.005161231,0.004570357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05225251,0.0003388996,0.001174836,0.002053061,0.01747915,0.007007202,0.004956647,0.009458204,0.001608943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003131278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003947568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007184626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01541948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893177,0.005253364,0.001836211,0.0007226559,0.002251057,0.0006189648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544538,0.01585302,0.00431172,0.004025494,0.0186088,0.002747251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001072523,0.00006480992,0.01180796,0.0004864607,0.00004360412,0.000562869,0.003883227,0.001744488,0.0009378985,0.8806479,0.04737292,0.05234059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003910163,0.0001369199,0.00936914,0.001855012,0.00006263015,0.001556134,0.008169918,0.009689691,0.001500981,0.6352018,0.3322414,0.000177243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.07018843,0.0114267,0.4449056,0.2556246,0.0156052,0.0008067554,0.001269585,0.0007905894,0.1993825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6197083,0.002209155,0.3277311,0.02810763,0.004117754,0.0008496275,0.0007322676,0.0003367562,0.01620736],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01930662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1021044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1028705607521966,"score_gpt":0.2945177494235709,"score_spread":0.1916471886713743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}