{"id":"W2915021571","doi":"","title":"Unpacking Reading Comprehension: An Examination of Text Type and Cognitive Functioning with Poor and Typically-Achieving Comprehenders","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2018 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Cognition; Psychology; Think aloud protocol; Reading (process); Narrative; Cognitive psychology; Protocol analysis; Rhetorical modes; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics education; Cognitive science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002679522,0.0006271809,0.0006660593,0.005171206,0.0005773366,0.001955479,0.0008178058,0.0008405417,0.002156088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01806621,0.0003790466,0.0006132974,0.001117755,0.00153978,0.002214668,0.001769767,0.0007695272,0.0003977978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004981214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004182088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003030349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003132866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984828,0.0002449676,0.0003615445,0.0002862825,0.0004445132,0.0001799026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879175,0.003800053,0.004579658,0.0007384605,0.002047872,0.0009164592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002146765,0.0002520004,0.9610292,0.00008995605,0.00007274603,0.0005331711,0.02179852,0.00007271642,0.003536137,0.0001279578,0.0001504547,0.01212247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008047203,0.0007687407,0.9805932,0.00003416095,0.0000433779,0.001688229,0.01463906,0.0001952925,0.001295828,0.0003176264,0.0003950614,0.0000213425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994538,0.00005758656,0.0000777956,0.00001507281,0.000001463695,0.00001064991,0.00003046775,0.000005487823,0.0003477143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991481,0.00004701299,0.000291315,0.00001577473,0.000002899314,0.0000237742,0.00006931907,0.000005596825,0.0003960973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005171206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01417089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08256965637743452,"score_gpt":0.3286354505799823,"score_spread":0.2460657942025478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}