{"id":"W2915067263","doi":"10.1175/jcli-d-18-0461.1","title":"A Climatological Assessment of Intense Extratropical Cyclones from the Potential Vorticity Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Climate","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions; University of Victoria; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"University at Albany; European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts; University of Reading","keywords":"Extratropical cyclone; Climatology; Environmental science; Potential vorticity; Tropical cyclone; Northern Hemisphere; Climate model; Storm track; Forecast skill; Atmospheric sciences; Storm; Vorticity; Climate change; Geology; Meteorology; Oceanography; Geography; Vortex","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002703951,0.0002295483,0.0001557823,0.002260012,0.0001841596,0.0005088715,0.0001004013,0.0001593092,0.00107832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006363028,0.0001062871,0.0001913629,0.001408,0.0001475268,0.0003645678,0.0004630178,0.0001772462,0.0001294659],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002140393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001756271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00643192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01438672,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998679,0.00002066093,0.00001484559,0.00002188473,0.0000431128,0.00003151734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994454,0.00008815961,0.0002087388,0.00002617617,0.0001224735,0.0001090368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007400208,0.00002484991,0.9833977,0.0000346231,0.00006987765,0.0001656377,0.0002588272,0.001179216,0.004329734,0.0001680189,0.0002471806,0.01005015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001025785,0.00001607217,0.9989901,0.000002637526,0.000004893907,0.00003372634,0.0001228566,0.00052027,0.00007134967,0.00001462222,0.0002209704,0.00000133019],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958211,0.0002445775,0.000234912,0.00003231345,0.000004721937,0.00001432013,0.0007637551,0.000009914406,0.002874206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983414,0.0002190952,0.0003484691,0.00001214825,0.00002234255,0.000008735697,0.0007635165,0.000003565796,0.0002806526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00643192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01278895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01412091053833637,"score_gpt":0.2877946296120524,"score_spread":0.2736737190737161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}