{"id":"W2915455154","doi":"10.2172/942117","title":"Shillapoo Wildlife Area, Annual Report 2004-2005.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Wetland; Setback; Unit (ring theory); Fiscal year; Work (physics); Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Fishery; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Engineering; Ecology; Business; Civil engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083147,0.0006896431,0.0001585727,0.001539229,0.0006187609,0.0009687145,0.0009172457,0.0003659631,0.02638583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001215376,0.000307315,0.00008790159,0.002334504,0.0001173797,0.0006915326,0.0004000268,0.0004579502,0.01107538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002880169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008846122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3233672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4796295,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999314,0.00004703851,0.00003523045,0.00004875955,0.0004700405,0.00008490664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987319,0.00005228119,0.00009393381,0.00003678939,0.000968832,0.0001163094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001064571,0.00009865702,0.01061123,0.0001689914,0.000008991185,0.00008331677,0.0001016091,0.0002081213,0.0002509658,0.0004945555,0.9546069,0.03326017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004007011,0.00006960044,0.07692242,0.000118115,0.00001283745,0.00009625841,0.0005074898,0.0003017213,0.000671541,0.0001105416,0.9211378,0.00001170787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.01881069,0.002280849,0.001233783,0.002550448,0.001203276,0.001062846,0.6766727,0.0005831783,0.2956022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03702968,0.003129817,0.00357011,0.0007148204,0.0001460428,0.001131468,0.4217274,0.000186576,0.5323641],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3233672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02333510961140767,"score_gpt":0.2539065784803329,"score_spread":0.2305714688689252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}