{"id":"W2915500942","doi":"","title":"CONJURER UN SORT INCERTAIN : LE PRINCIPE DE PRECAUTION ET L’EVALUATION DES ESPECES EN PERIL AU CANADA","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Endangered species; Risk assessment; Precautionary principle; Wildlife trade; Listing (finance); Geography; Legislation; Environmental planning; Business; Political science; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Ecology; Law; Computer science; Biology; Environmental science; Habitat; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01037663,0.0005828686,0.00073339,0.00417259,0.005635957,0.007434465,0.00204899,0.00318772,0.001622211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01787021,0.0003888115,0.0005809083,0.004004894,0.006771868,0.002125178,0.0009634895,0.002189192,0.0004080847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04119607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09505734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9421232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9719189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9831266,0.002298248,0.0005868408,0.0005975185,0.01216723,0.001223639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844899,0.002446553,0.0007041137,0.0003893591,0.01161773,0.0003522711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008133757,0.00004746595,0.01098678,0.002830683,0.0001184751,0.0006255524,0.006409933,0.002133519,0.001827435,0.3588219,0.3192375,0.2968793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007837073,0.00004589306,0.01304279,0.001669172,0.00009989648,0.0002319369,0.002450361,0.0004473818,0.001014687,0.01392053,0.9669917,0.00007785704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02163675,0.5643522,0.01507208,0.1509835,0.009621905,0.0005014425,0.0008510032,0.0001556474,0.2368254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4228579,0.2934775,0.03500111,0.04423618,0.002983405,0.0003017765,0.0005411449,0.0001562828,0.2004448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05787683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2988999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03342484951496749,"score_gpt":0.2499768510341789,"score_spread":0.2165520015192114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}