{"id":"W2915830965","doi":"10.1097/mnm.0000000000000996","title":"Quantitative analysis of technetium-99m-sestamibi uptake and washout in parathyroid scintigraphy supports dual mechanisms of lesion conspicuity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","topic":"Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Washout; Medicine; Thyroid; Nuclear medicine; Parathyroid adenoma; Scintigraphy; Technetium (99mTc) sestamibi; Single-photon emission computed tomography; Adenoma; Technetium-99m; Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi; Hyperparathyroidism; Lesion; Technetium; Radiology; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003862134,0.0001623579,0.0007876172,0.0008334522,0.00006288058,0.000003507328,0.0002047263,0.0001013912,0.0001051904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001354346,0.0001333951,0.000119745,0.001349289,0.0005395252,0.00007003995,0.0001434945,0.0002062482,0.000009724095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002609642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005672047,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005622641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000355375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985932,0.0001067466,0.000603818,0.0002492833,0.0002837231,0.0001631908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979146,0.0002185865,0.0002962668,0.001294956,0.0001768656,0.0000987543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006943787,0.003421322,0.5175302,0.0001521944,0.002790404,0.00002739508,0.008930895,0.00005442398,0.2887006,0.173172,0.003091439,0.001434779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004578802,0.002042581,0.9746269,0.0002117492,0.002050853,0.0000132452,0.007419037,0.00559298,0.0005453998,0.001664795,0.001076166,0.000177495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878215,0.004099227,0.0001045203,0.001530544,0.00002309793,0.0005478156,0.00003776626,0.00002651275,0.005808997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942704,0.002065313,0.003304338,0.0001478651,0.000002435079,0.0000106708,0.0001226771,0.00001691214,0.00005934409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4570967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5439695,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04421455669377638,"score_gpt":0.3444722187640757,"score_spread":0.3002576620702994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}