{"id":"W2916364562","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2019.02.019","title":"Dynamic domino effect risk assessment using Petri-nets","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Domino effect; Domino; Bayesian network; Petri net; Computer science; Process (computing); Reliability engineering; Stochastic Petri net; Risk analysis (engineering); Dynamic Bayesian network; Feature (linguistics); Bayesian probability; Engineering; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Distributed computing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002500779,0.001047542,0.0007989895,0.002490477,0.0004564373,0.001935557,0.000881138,0.0006342681,0.001674618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005078432,0.0003469793,0.0009046351,0.0007782043,0.0008275944,0.001508699,0.001173873,0.0005955126,0.0001110433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001440002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001190452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004680476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003580268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99858,0.0003978117,0.00004911379,0.0001606635,0.0006599693,0.00015248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996145,0.002914063,0.0003125782,0.0001487996,0.0003803186,0.00009915669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001439503,0.00005068925,0.002899958,0.00006271207,0.00008913616,0.0001613356,0.00004459046,0.9327762,0.003733191,0.03518256,0.0001652788,0.02469042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005252232,0.00003467079,0.0005789979,0.000009437677,0.00002406465,0.00003847549,0.00001640073,0.980363,0.001423707,0.01718095,0.000313921,0.00001112274],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1104446,0.0003857861,0.8805445,0.00009460439,0.00003149934,0.00008726768,0.0001097866,0.0002393614,0.008062579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524063,0.0002523376,0.04446039,0.00001950657,0.0000201772,0.00005316349,0.00007959898,0.00003200125,0.002676547],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004680476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0132255,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01592548231436118,"score_gpt":0.3092137443846028,"score_spread":0.2932882620702416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}