{"id":"W2916392637","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2019.01.005","title":"Assessment of Image Quality and Dosimetric Performance of CT Simulators","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Image quality; Imaging phantom; Quality assurance; Computer science; Software; Protocol (science); Image resolution; Medical physics; Quality (philosophy); Acceptance testing; Nuclear medicine; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Image (mathematics); Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003196545,0.00005535355,0.0002840191,0.0003764131,0.00004441192,0.00002412411,0.00009196267,0.00001660226,0.00006894895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006569932,0.00003652391,0.00004344022,0.000412142,0.0003119121,0.0004287983,0.0000207776,0.000149406,4.095181e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001697991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003011731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001632656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.387115e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980997,0.00006075847,0.0005460896,0.00009513879,0.001106322,0.00009196466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988031,0.0003388552,0.0005318528,0.00005962322,0.0001214576,0.0001450533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008009742,0.0000372305,0.9293672,0.00009803329,0.00001475024,0.000002383021,0.0001119368,0.0000343436,0.002012777,0.00008369722,0.00009753124,0.06813204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001072562,0.000161952,0.8958946,0.0001685387,0.00002714444,0.0001097022,0.0004231955,0.1002905,0.001513082,0.00002166306,0.0002775259,0.00003948748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932535,0.002238937,0.0002246391,0.003470505,0.0002068197,0.00005102927,6.817833e-7,0.000002571141,0.0005513722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970746,0.001885674,0.0006887713,0.000259713,0.00007551283,1.358554e-7,2.966215e-7,0.000002261302,0.00001304288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1002562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1489402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02219927601196534,"score_gpt":0.3986408758298876,"score_spread":0.3764415998179222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}