{"id":"W2917139413","doi":"10.1111/ncmr.12154","title":"When the <scp>SUIT</scp> Fits: Constructive Controversy Training in Face‐to‐Face and Virtual Teams","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Negotiation and Conflict Management Research","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constructive; Scope (computer science); Task (project management); Computer science; Face (sociological concept); Teamwork; Knowledge management; Work (physics); Face-to-face; Psychology; Process (computing); Management; Engineering; Sociology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002253089,0.0002495676,0.0003896157,0.000308518,0.0008099017,0.001048822,0.0006890827,0.000694458,0.004851668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01233105,0.0002001302,0.0001877843,0.0001841865,0.0009642953,0.000780559,0.001573687,0.001132959,0.0003422027],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003072998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005868549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000305344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004468995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981288,0.001135057,0.00006623452,0.0001850907,0.0002681105,0.0002166843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926506,0.00419115,0.0007366691,0.0005648777,0.0002746041,0.001582155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01670758,0.1700982,0.04332148,0.001194783,0.0002366818,0.0006633544,0.02571811,0.005367868,0.1356382,0.008212877,0.006175332,0.5866656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007390399,0.2383033,0.5012498,0.001077213,0.0005022974,0.001478223,0.03049147,0.04903261,0.111193,0.02290995,0.03595183,0.0004198778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949537,0.00001785203,0.001874508,0.000140066,0.00003737365,0.000148338,0.000006235764,0.00003340323,0.002788493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951337,0.00002204456,0.003514362,0.0001190385,0.0000223284,0.0003131456,0.00001229055,0.000008789408,0.0008544022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004851668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01623046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03686262402860451,"score_gpt":0.347523045749667,"score_spread":0.3106604217210625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}