{"id":"W2917282631","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.026","title":"Synthesizing expert opinion to assess the at-sea risks to seabirds in the western North Atlantic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Birds Canada; Mount Allison University","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Mount Allison University; Bird Studies Canada","keywords":"Bycatch; Fishery; Environmental science; Seabird; Endangered species; Analytic hierarchy process; Marine conservation; Marine debris; Stakeholder; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Debris; Operations research; Habitat; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Engineering; Predation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06416019,0.0004215538,0.0008557421,0.007884335,0.001328031,0.003540515,0.001636527,0.003329853,0.003124213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2521061,0.0003819943,0.001178048,0.00351011,0.001376336,0.002499415,0.00225596,0.002217872,0.0004279288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003953953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01332154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01883847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05183483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9628636,0.01574783,0.01181592,0.001728856,0.006929976,0.0009138029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6215007,0.2746347,0.02533553,0.004298586,0.06933742,0.004893152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008165152,0.0003824873,0.1327368,0.06699109,0.005767142,0.00169842,0.03736182,0.00219401,0.003441036,0.003970421,0.1704236,0.5742167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003828779,0.0005397591,0.2011688,0.2336254,0.008769292,0.00108227,0.09349491,0.004096238,0.002354638,0.01594357,0.4381832,0.0003592092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2993948,0.2347546,0.01462939,0.3513589,0.02127076,0.002348149,0.01253913,0.00008870167,0.06361557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8310093,0.08210944,0.01960981,0.05474638,0.006031372,0.0009325132,0.003458256,0.00004223314,0.002060727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3393156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1576848386678766,"score_gpt":0.3314500327654894,"score_spread":0.1737651940976128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}