{"id":"W2917432326","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2018-0125","title":"Patterns of citations for the growth of knowledge: a Foucauldian perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Citation; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Knowledge management; Social science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007433784,0.00005075437,0.0001932312,0.01245172,0.00005683434,0.0002203888,0.0007342087,0.00002912093,0.000332907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009524547,0.00002821699,0.0001998672,0.02062823,0.00003704507,0.0006669422,0.00005743789,0.00009326709,0.000015117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009263757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001944839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007640768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001909635,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965483,0.0001093506,0.0007022144,0.0001142239,0.002405149,0.000120771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839817,0.005891331,0.0009495448,0.0001664169,0.008943749,0.00006727316],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003042739,0.0006170899,0.8520913,0.00007202518,0.0002826991,0.000001374087,0.0126029,0.0004114922,0.01542945,0.0509402,0.01334371,0.05390355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002474979,0.001655436,0.8714898,0.0000521454,0.00006353601,0.00001145937,0.03687088,0.002414529,0.01558467,0.06782775,0.001447922,0.0001069308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.962219,0.0006447208,0.03259645,0.002379422,0.0006117903,0.0003740556,0.00003185614,0.000001056377,0.001141658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982113,0.000119902,0.001017028,0.00001865916,0.00005367206,0.000003165828,5.973493e-7,0.000003718246,0.0005719239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05379662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988186,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3639709923264734,"score_gpt":0.5913081892117475,"score_spread":0.2273371968852742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}