{"id":"W2918872093","doi":"10.5006/c2017-09560","title":"A Framework for the Probabilistic Integrity and Risk Assessment of Unpiggable Pipelines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Probabilistic logic; Integrity management; Reliability engineering; Risk assessment; Computer science; Probabilistic risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Corrosion; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Materials science; Computer security; Business; Metallurgy; Artificial intelligence; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003500124,0.00009345237,0.0001870027,0.00001834731,0.0002879889,0.0000929532,0.0002419512,0.0001036315,0.00006247031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001256531,0.00004985477,0.00009394505,0.00003500708,0.0001997682,0.00008815201,0.00004534174,0.000369489,6.062742e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001846915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001327344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009952452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005418923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999494,0.00001540896,0.0001806601,0.0001158426,0.00008169818,0.0001124466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985993,0.0007322893,0.00006415296,0.0004668947,0.000107794,0.0000295932],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006982916,0.0001360191,0.2126508,0.002217927,0.002089243,0.000001050888,0.0009634814,0.09237284,0.0007642434,0.5918355,0.002983088,0.09391595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001312005,0.0000304397,0.08444034,0.00004902809,0.0002386171,0.000001007838,0.000237673,0.7248663,0.0006909766,0.1884995,0.0007019016,0.0001129599],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5002787,0.0004927298,0.4937917,0.001792109,0.0005311894,0.0005777901,0.00006207741,0.0001034049,0.002370225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580954,0.0005043745,0.04118011,0.000009968941,0.00006624789,0.00002772768,0.00000116038,0.00000665811,0.0001083875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6324935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2215007,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03257557876907362,"score_gpt":0.3231344952518991,"score_spread":0.2905589164828254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}