{"id":"W2918872093","doi":"10.5006/c2017-09560","title":"A Framework for the Probabilistic Integrity and Risk Assessment of Unpiggable Pipelines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pipeline transport; Probabilistic logic; Integrity management; Reliability engineering; Risk assessment; Computer science; Probabilistic risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Corrosion; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Materials science; Computer security; Business; Metallurgy; Artificial intelligence; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007408556,0.001707342,0.001234041,0.003611923,0.0009183559,0.003726466,0.003825595,0.001998219,0.002494094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009484665,0.001066078,0.002567685,0.001505776,0.002915733,0.00320782,0.00307462,0.002585011,0.0005521702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003029711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003749519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01352592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009307466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995607,0.001652645,0.0002690742,0.0006579489,0.001562555,0.000250859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951925,0.002256587,0.000642406,0.0004269235,0.001217517,0.000264024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001328289,0.00004217987,0.0004549105,0.00008749188,0.0000529959,0.0001803689,0.0001575516,0.6044133,0.0008342568,0.3811425,0.0007181339,0.01190312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000496184,0.00002212172,0.00009404775,0.00004263882,0.00001838136,0.00004192464,0.00002154034,0.9036537,0.000217617,0.09312447,0.002741779,0.00001683511],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001572434,0.0001339125,0.9967147,0.000133486,0.00001261526,0.00003075141,0.00004683435,0.0000925599,0.001262735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2236039,0.0008986551,0.7705898,0.0001053255,0.0001680369,0.0003873713,0.0003098772,0.000141588,0.00379549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01352592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0391807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03257557876907362,"score_gpt":0.3231344952518991,"score_spread":0.2905589164828254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}