{"id":"W2920187272","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.035","title":"A Prospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Physical Examination for Pulmonary Hypertension","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CHEST Journal","topic":"Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"Bayer Canada; Canadian Thoracic Society; Gilead Sciences; Bayer; United Therapeutics Corporation; Actelion Pharmaceuticals; Novartis; Bellerophon Therapeutics; European Respiratory Society","keywords":"Medicine; Internal medicine; Physical examination; Cardiology; Logistic regression; Pulmonary hypertension; Parasternal line; Central venous pressure; Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing; Prospective cohort study; Univariate analysis; Confidence interval; Blood pressure; Multivariate analysis; Heart rate","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005792807,0.00007695927,0.0001865365,0.0000414726,0.00009491765,0.000005864777,0.0001138582,0.00003610322,0.00002725337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003486266,0.00003499069,0.0001788113,0.0001674527,0.00007214431,0.00009190931,0.00004596644,0.0001778339,0.000004774071],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001008387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002925251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004371529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.963812e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986496,0.0001521009,0.0001751194,0.0001091495,0.0007887374,0.0001252907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978631,0.0006581932,0.0002087743,0.0002417462,0.0009743592,0.00005379449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006263198,0.003679241,0.5973013,0.0003431345,0.0003173898,0.0000387648,0.000448108,0.0001004271,0.3265471,0.0001208202,0.000454508,0.07002287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001966091,0.000312375,0.9563506,0.0002960649,0.0002810573,0.0004359345,0.0001442571,0.00905033,0.02980087,0.001267006,0.00006197275,0.00003348853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967411,0.0002682515,0.00000832392,0.0009122128,0.0001718877,0.001433758,0.000006588677,0.000002570263,0.0004553213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954,0.00003498749,0.0000480108,0.00004390449,0.0001072402,0.0000342235,0.00000363602,0.000009379379,0.0001786294],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3590492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4173638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04957074953062033,"score_gpt":0.3297220138770278,"score_spread":0.2801512643464075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}