{"id":"W2920187272","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.035","title":"A Prospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Physical Examination for Pulmonary Hypertension","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CHEST Journal","topic":"Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"Bayer Canada; Canadian Thoracic Society; Gilead Sciences; Bayer; United Therapeutics Corporation; Actelion Pharmaceuticals; Novartis; Bellerophon Therapeutics; European Respiratory Society","keywords":"Medicine; Internal medicine; Physical examination; Cardiology; Logistic regression; Pulmonary hypertension; Parasternal line; Central venous pressure; Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing; Prospective cohort study; Univariate analysis; Confidence interval; Blood pressure; Multivariate analysis; Heart rate","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005743865,0.0008563293,0.0006438577,0.001487991,0.001037861,0.001175635,0.0008058287,0.001695878,0.002276978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02179734,0.001016522,0.0008221759,0.001272236,0.001129608,0.001751625,0.001096168,0.001118283,0.0009149366],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004089393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005622604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001778669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001590471,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956734,0.002159896,0.0004608031,0.0006681326,0.000641714,0.0003961366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766853,0.01240673,0.004329606,0.002172709,0.00287669,0.001529004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001508904,0.0003915921,0.9964134,0.00001223658,0.00007691567,0.00009498045,0.0001019183,0.00003698932,0.0001954775,0.00002720013,0.00003810922,0.001102332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001984157,0.004056016,0.9937863,0.00001300869,0.0001366611,0.0005389004,0.0002290372,0.0005144464,0.0002080681,0.00005203887,0.0002508544,0.00001623732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986067,0.0002946092,0.0001857512,0.00005236799,0.00001591329,0.00003780435,0.0002112637,0.000004921641,0.0005905814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991425,0.00008709806,0.0002076048,0.00003529663,0.00003202032,0.00002707317,0.0003059831,0.00000285614,0.0001594481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005743865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03037679,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04957074953062033,"score_gpt":0.3297220138770278,"score_spread":0.2801512643464075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}