{"id":"W2920870772","doi":"10.1108/ijilt-05-2018-0059","title":"Capturing digital (in)equity in teaching and learning: a sociocritical approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Information and Learning Technology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Equity (law); Value (mathematics); Dimension (graph theory); Computer science; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Critical theory; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Management science; Social science; Psychology; Engineering; Mathematics; Political science; Qualitative research; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02201147,0.001021504,0.0007554844,0.01128539,0.008150904,0.01686595,0.002032619,0.002593504,0.004639868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02985679,0.0005486884,0.0005671219,0.004284512,0.04543941,0.01814621,0.01727246,0.003809373,0.000290248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01209214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008773422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001899669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00248818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868165,0.009594641,0.0004184446,0.0006624432,0.001836537,0.0006714517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962479,0.02843314,0.002591565,0.002229277,0.002934673,0.00133227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003149437,0.00009257725,0.00309828,0.0003291189,0.00001601259,0.0002846284,0.1183815,0.0003228594,0.0005689829,0.8361259,0.001514495,0.03923412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002011751,0.00005602723,0.002436377,0.001347081,0.00003908706,0.0003852501,0.1669053,0.001641864,0.001651793,0.7368253,0.08866321,0.0000285025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2477472,0.01094894,0.3826714,0.04718379,0.001067463,0.001206305,0.0001525207,0.0001721687,0.3088502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547689,0.001707408,0.03697243,0.00155568,0.0002976177,0.0004955082,0.0000412739,0.00006586092,0.00409523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02201147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1164092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01375523681198238,"score_gpt":0.331899162989753,"score_spread":0.3181439261777706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}