{"id":"W2920888885","doi":"10.1353/cbq.2018.0071","title":"Lydia as a Rhetorical Construct in Acts by Alexandra Gruca-Macaulay","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Catholic Biblical quarterly","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Scholarship; Construct (python library); Rhetoric; Interpretation (philosophy); Exposition (narrative); Literature; Philosophy; History; Classics; Art; Art history; Theology; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000321399,0.0002949754,0.0003744347,0.0005211619,0.0005140481,0.0005310649,0.0004481923,0.00014804,0.002814626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004795594,0.000195631,0.0001608239,0.0008635074,0.001367394,0.0003399113,0.00006141508,0.0004253289,0.001523403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006604558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004088117,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001804913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003675882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978144,0.0001615856,0.0005401495,0.0004493088,0.0004117345,0.0006227908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988171,0.0003001581,0.0001243663,0.0003730753,0.0001926391,0.0001926855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002581735,0.0005023003,0.0009560239,0.0000368703,0.0001185605,0.00001619725,0.1250506,1.270476e-7,0.0007227246,0.3320158,0.4439061,0.09641656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006034384,0.0011922,0.00150119,0.00002866346,0.00002343776,0.00002186802,0.002219159,0.000232243,0.00004402431,0.007104311,0.9867142,0.0003151935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7046219,0.0009986026,0.0001644046,0.008949653,0.001473387,0.000566553,0.00008139433,0.000224156,0.28292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880887,0.00003920088,0.00002531855,0.007815789,0.001274082,0.00008212122,0.00001293179,0.00002801468,0.002633872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02330265877955271,"score_gpt":0.2669550172118379,"score_spread":0.2436523584322852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}