{"id":"W2921602097","doi":"","title":"THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND TRIBUNALS - DEFERENCE TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS: A RECENT PHENOMENON OR A RETURN TO BASICS?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Scrutiny; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Judicial review; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Administrative law; Political science; Standard of review; Judicial opinion","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001210995,0.00008833431,0.0001843497,0.0000105883,0.001784152,0.00004601217,0.0004080744,0.0000168847,0.0002030362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001339366,0.00003960592,0.00002133281,0.0005229671,0.0003150722,0.00002769792,0.00002653044,0.00008466907,0.000007434671],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002999467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006905638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9409727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988341,0.0001980625,0.0001939473,0.0001263284,0.0003247703,0.0003227509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998974,0.0002351148,0.00006607611,0.0001514956,0.0002597061,0.0003136004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001503837,0.00002863899,0.003072772,0.0002554277,0.0002476119,0.0000454034,0.02846753,0.000006011385,0.000001899089,0.5404303,0.2494415,0.1778525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002482309,0.00003292526,0.001282884,0.0003968999,0.00002758358,0.000002766752,0.002636634,2.477827e-7,0.000001152957,0.00191574,0.9936104,0.00006791535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005679952,0.0664805,0.000004581368,0.8471725,0.0001661367,0.002072951,0.0001335247,0.000007092239,0.07828276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8923031,0.08961047,0.000007212004,0.01665467,0.0001415874,0.0001431544,0.000001346983,0.000004280824,0.001134177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8866231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0904309366278587,"score_gpt":0.3370649587114566,"score_spread":0.2466340220835979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}