{"id":"W2921625362","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwz006.243","title":"A244 ENDOSCOPIC REMOVAL OF MIGRATED INTRAUTERINE DEVICE: CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Intrauterine device; Uterine perforation; Surgery; Uterine cavity; Abdominal pain; Laparotomy; Family planning; Uterus; Population; Research methodology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004562744,0.001142553,0.001354638,0.006988209,0.0009948972,0.00184204,0.001267867,0.002429118,0.003140141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002354116,0.0005081713,0.001105448,0.005807544,0.001344826,0.002789661,0.001163886,0.001244735,0.001225946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005340602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001094223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001113014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001840417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989957,0.0001023627,0.0004196517,0.0001935381,0.000181322,0.0001073001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986185,0.0004736145,0.0005841536,0.00007797432,0.0001233026,0.0001223881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001127629,0.0001493779,0.01624952,0.01144574,0.0003052433,0.8712969,0.0008297813,0.0001950906,0.002021818,0.0006523994,0.0115764,0.08516496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000123065,0.00003939034,0.004970566,0.002034399,0.0002033897,0.9723317,0.0005318454,0.00008206441,0.0003223325,0.0002836531,0.01916082,0.00002758914],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05919862,0.9284616,0.001558185,0.001915256,0.001208053,0.0001282827,0.0003967535,0.00009770585,0.007035523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2711853,0.7147093,0.00263098,0.003819358,0.004097614,0.0001000819,0.0008377357,0.00005381173,0.002565703],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006988209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01050484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008082648389361078,"score_gpt":0.267036812293833,"score_spread":0.258954163904472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}