{"id":"W2921844405","doi":"","title":"THE RECEPTION OF EQUITY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (1875-2000)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Equity (law); Tort; Political science; Conscience; Good faith; Duty; Liability; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003921877,0.0003033902,0.000360123,0.003838308,0.01874105,0.0111168,0.001557501,0.005730758,0.004390316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01340905,0.0006866739,0.000319157,0.005209874,0.01120691,0.001929036,0.002445311,0.00658163,0.0002569841],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2159964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1813286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932405,0.0004430962,0.0001083188,0.000581463,0.003612191,0.002014548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994037,0.001204508,0.0002550444,0.0001281158,0.00350764,0.0008676864],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003065022,0.00001602887,0.002807956,0.00009015339,0.00002151073,0.0003906577,0.009235682,0.0005025272,0.0002755806,0.8135133,0.1439612,0.02915477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001885412,0.00001364073,0.02202382,0.0003798224,0.00002982519,0.00009521877,0.002887563,0.0003752787,0.0005051788,0.03173925,0.9418362,0.00009543222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.103292,0.05768014,0.001859568,0.1699844,0.002761352,0.0001081534,0.001712286,0.00009004998,0.662512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8236387,0.01208915,0.001238428,0.0341425,0.0008322506,0.00003718315,0.0002817968,0.00005187346,0.1276882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2159964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9093331,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06841189570124676,"score_gpt":0.3508208244777272,"score_spread":0.2824089287764804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}