{"id":"W2921970691","doi":"10.1177/0361198119834298","title":"Risk and Reliability Analysis of Geometric Design Criteria: A Critical Synthesis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Mountain-Plains Consortium; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Probabilistic design; Reliability (semiconductor); Context (archaeology); Geometric design; Probabilistic logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Range (aeronautics); Computer science; Reliability engineering; Design methods; Engineering design process; Operations research; Engineering; Transport engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03267469,0.003408353,0.00329634,0.01582642,0.001522716,0.008611667,0.003474776,0.003594946,0.004145563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07220788,0.002040387,0.003034426,0.007217653,0.007171513,0.009487012,0.002950984,0.005600896,0.001230157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006268302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005087699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00296308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002527804,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9761187,0.01146573,0.002365974,0.001672726,0.007886371,0.0004905268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9241325,0.05921352,0.003074876,0.002383653,0.01090495,0.0002905188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007735272,0.0001548666,0.001318124,0.008781382,0.0003438573,0.0002711444,0.001261418,0.0625874,0.001421716,0.6234155,0.006547546,0.2938196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002838138,0.0004987821,0.001850352,0.01389856,0.0004275425,0.0005012821,0.001205205,0.06102458,0.002687634,0.7878534,0.1297776,0.0002468101],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004651455,0.2914381,0.6715062,0.008467658,0.001135768,0.000471056,0.0001339337,0.000121135,0.0220747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1343285,0.3901604,0.4596215,0.002923608,0.004844626,0.002068772,0.0002480314,0.000225947,0.005578625],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03267469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1728023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04799401588853876,"score_gpt":0.3486404442188162,"score_spread":0.3006464283302775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}