{"id":"W2922143494","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5788","title":"Advocacy in Non-Adversarial Family Law: A Recommendation for Revision to the Model Code","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Negotiation; Family law; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0956605,0.0009414451,0.001808707,0.003672924,0.009441639,0.01984203,0.0108415,0.03316604,0.01131408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2087588,0.0008674196,0.003354792,0.004162317,0.04065809,0.03039527,0.01073596,0.04693011,0.004831778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02498146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.155122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1642179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2261327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9196621,0.03322271,0.008309476,0.004187517,0.02873368,0.005884523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7014531,0.1391984,0.01219721,0.02634882,0.09932127,0.02148117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007655018,0.0004095887,0.00240706,0.0009059027,0.00002750925,0.0003312479,0.01226147,0.0005368632,0.0002768784,0.5264696,0.3450776,0.1112198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119613,0.0001431145,0.00274967,0.005834408,0.00005781919,0.000409346,0.01173744,0.0009832154,0.0003213456,0.1453425,0.8320774,0.0002241787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002706019,0.00469166,0.009223219,0.9483694,0.009381033,0.0004623534,0.00008031193,0.0002385501,0.02484741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09589474,0.01501041,0.1489831,0.6747816,0.009933787,0.00350232,0.0006170999,0.0005140323,0.05076289],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1642179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5059071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1206233574443123,"score_gpt":0.4562086055721405,"score_spread":0.3355852481278283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}