{"id":"W2922277100","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2018-0481","title":"Mapping black ash dominated stands using geospatial and forest inventory data in northern Minnesota, USA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Northern Research Station; U.S. Forest Service; Colorado State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Emerald ash borer; Forest inventory; Black spruce; Geospatial analysis; Geography; Agrilus; Forestry; Fraxinus; Environmental science; Wetland; Forest management; Taiga; Physical geography; Ecology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003634374,0.0002173317,0.0001009546,0.001039839,0.0003046897,0.0004293814,0.0002338875,0.0001081207,0.0003425473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007590678,0.0001344258,0.0001550863,0.0008558554,0.00010664,0.0001786278,0.0003226108,0.000102149,0.00008693411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001536009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00120829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.722034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9190599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999858,0.00002643539,0.00001280654,0.00005337551,0.00003257425,0.00001690146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996401,0.00005036428,0.000080853,0.00002860146,0.0001551874,0.00004491881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002925818,0.00003882884,0.9833938,0.00002267094,0.00005001799,0.00006589587,0.0003067415,0.003232703,0.0009673529,0.0001006131,0.0008018223,0.01099022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004283001,0.00001329769,0.9860398,0.00002081711,0.00002876114,0.00002812153,0.0006389043,0.01181899,0.0002228864,0.00004151918,0.00113628,0.000006433012],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964046,0.0001316161,0.0004851415,0.00003501974,0.000002990951,0.00001757108,0.002211883,0.00002138571,0.0006898049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950427,0.0001187283,0.002260077,0.00001394871,0.000001505174,0.00001245834,0.002129259,0.000003537296,0.0004177331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.722034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.559206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05594305795957513,"score_gpt":0.305557035485793,"score_spread":0.2496139775262179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}