{"id":"W2922846628","doi":"10.21606/drs.2018.197","title":"Designerly Activity Theory: toward a new ontology for design research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of DRS","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Computer science; Collaborative design; Situated; Context (archaeology); Activity theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Data science; Human–computer interaction; Management science; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Systems design; Engineering; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001863486,0.0001018988,0.0001540789,0.0001691396,0.00007988818,0.00005107303,0.0002345018,0.0001006825,0.0001184577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001026463,0.0001019291,0.00003609145,0.0003096985,0.000107571,0.0003688469,0.00001636433,0.0001709494,0.00005294053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005866075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002106152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001832534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991784,0.00002348542,0.0001337221,0.0001730447,0.0001664848,0.0003248338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985884,0.0006785262,0.00004823835,0.00006983959,0.0005007206,0.0001142755],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001300402,0.0001614004,0.0002025167,0.0004044949,0.0001646441,3.356583e-7,0.01440727,0.00002227089,0.4726191,0.0914002,0.2475156,0.1718018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001060878,0.001659518,0.001020355,0.00007086345,0.00007362463,0.0000194429,0.001996342,0.00471963,0.7619053,0.1144795,0.1125542,0.0004404117],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2316865,0.0004279565,0.6376787,0.003350814,0.001182309,0.002089674,0.000005732391,0.0006261413,0.1229522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540698,0.0000206901,0.04405179,0.00003890285,0.0003236794,0.00006976985,3.260773e-7,0.00003190375,0.001393134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7223833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.415655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2198292669153495,"score_gpt":0.3969753332972489,"score_spread":0.1771460663818994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}