{"id":"W2922846628","doi":"10.21606/drs.2018.197","title":"Designerly Activity Theory: toward a new ontology for design research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of DRS","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Computer science; Collaborative design; Situated; Context (archaeology); Activity theory; Interpretation (philosophy); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Data science; Human–computer interaction; Management science; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Systems design; Engineering; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03440399,0.00132791,0.001792375,0.00876529,0.003964503,0.01849964,0.004713835,0.00535536,0.003349334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02378368,0.001255788,0.002126609,0.005750121,0.04176586,0.02612281,0.008474094,0.007399868,0.0009166949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00738868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008766205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002880407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002036857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9571313,0.03213408,0.00221322,0.003231435,0.004413294,0.0008766782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963376,0.02608159,0.001508566,0.005680146,0.002220003,0.001133603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004604051,0.00001827195,0.000265038,0.0001060034,0.000006487708,0.000042429,0.00530235,0.0004931198,0.0001248053,0.9865531,0.0004370429,0.00664668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001976269,0.00002768299,0.0001844968,0.0002786098,0.00001097865,0.0001834903,0.003758975,0.004309137,0.0003222408,0.9199818,0.0708994,0.0000235786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004228902,0.001833642,0.9545196,0.007981742,0.000290155,0.0002953011,0.00009979913,0.0001649874,0.0305859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1939235,0.002900389,0.7916495,0.00201656,0.000338777,0.002059479,0.0003034206,0.000231606,0.006576926],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03440399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1819479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2198292669153495,"score_gpt":0.3969753332972489,"score_spread":0.1771460663818994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}