{"id":"W2923397091","doi":"10.1111/cag.12519","title":"Food for naught: Using the theory of planned behaviour to better understand household food wasting behaviour","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd","keywords":"Wasting; Respondent; Theory of planned behavior; Food waste; Multilevel model; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Environmental health; Control (management); Economics; Medicine; Political science; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005147493,0.000346848,0.0003954308,0.0005115219,0.0007620174,0.0001140964,0.0005710265,0.0001871811,0.00005193323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008746846,0.0001685084,0.0004210304,0.00269639,0.0005507164,0.0001590055,0.00006174091,0.0001895234,5.100758e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001104747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008631416,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08130676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9189552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997587,0.0001210752,0.0004292933,0.0005618924,0.0002322939,0.001068505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983501,0.000309552,0.0001624724,0.0002773223,0.0002458229,0.0006546835],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002135565,0.00007946437,0.9679882,0.0001322847,0.0003010664,0.000006355694,0.002001971,0.0001826482,0.001581112,0.009534872,0.001455804,0.01652266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005690938,0.003923285,0.535211,0.000135462,0.000211176,0.00005090153,0.4458178,0.00001979666,0.000597019,0.005985898,0.006414307,0.001064243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993962,0.0004648787,0.000004061312,0.002085904,0.0005325461,0.001328036,0.001474067,0.000054064,0.00009444496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990298,0.00002309461,0.00009614773,0.0005101925,0.0001392551,0.00005926451,0.00006664505,0.000009511364,0.00006608677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8376485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9248109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02854710713331179,"score_gpt":0.2017331103528876,"score_spread":0.1731860032195758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}