{"id":"W2923397091","doi":"10.1111/cag.12519","title":"Food for naught: Using the theory of planned behaviour to better understand household food wasting behaviour","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd","keywords":"Wasting; Respondent; Theory of planned behavior; Food waste; Multilevel model; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Environmental health; Control (management); Economics; Medicine; Political science; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005078975,0.0006036147,0.0005239367,0.001464755,0.0003821653,0.001472215,0.0005433611,0.0007391382,0.001823445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01798818,0.0004707414,0.001100113,0.001089836,0.0009359649,0.002274423,0.00044748,0.001306351,0.000167473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002059929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002038553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03206176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03500926,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977784,0.001711834,0.00008344209,0.0001356564,0.0002047593,0.00008599302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852225,0.01266162,0.001177112,0.000203796,0.0004945357,0.0002404521],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000472318,0.001069595,0.7045759,0.0017576,0.0008469331,0.000792914,0.0277373,0.04267685,0.001132295,0.01750461,0.003485198,0.1979485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002589112,0.002932636,0.6120043,0.002080907,0.0006898429,0.0009829552,0.02144417,0.2896826,0.001067519,0.05736239,0.01120986,0.0002838693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.834394,0.003376887,0.1434574,0.004348623,0.0002093545,0.001057363,0.001149049,0.0003215262,0.01168578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661203,0.0008896764,0.03161961,0.000229966,0.00002592428,0.0004199018,0.0002913713,0.00001186637,0.0003913477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06375027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02854710713331179,"score_gpt":0.2017331103528876,"score_spread":0.1731860032195758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}