{"id":"W2925071841","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.044","title":"Renewable energy-driven desalination opportunities – A case study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Renewable energy; Desalination; Water scarcity; Scarcity; Natural resource economics; Water resources; Population; Business; Water pumping; Population growth; Environmental engineering; Environmental science; Water resource management; Engineering; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005321537,0.0006838148,0.001519222,0.0003503581,0.0002256981,0.00007081061,0.0007051807,0.0001514876,0.0008588538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000045028,0.0005488372,0.0005814835,0.000191717,0.0001795255,0.0004366234,0.001530851,0.000268404,0.0001516957],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001572679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001737482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000381959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002674737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960701,0.000377475,0.001417358,0.000545136,0.001125578,0.0004642858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997559,0.00007770578,0.001552225,0.0006080484,0.000005523777,0.0001974957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002492375,0.002299625,0.0001298961,0.001552831,0.002269021,0.02805738,0.0004011158,0.001499642,0.000002101888,0.000324093,0.01145453,0.9519848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006273576,0.000856332,0.00003257596,0.001005605,0.002959033,0.003173106,0.004371088,0.00002828249,0.000001566395,0.0004220058,0.9859344,0.0005886215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002026364,0.9463322,0.0002914294,0.00003530093,0.0008675193,0.001024992,0.00008063306,0.00002723631,0.05113811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01070091,0.96947,0.0004612908,0.00008089895,0.0001545176,0.00008269805,0.00002139456,0.0001058318,0.01892247],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9744799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08648876424198391,"score_gpt":0.2821937694957356,"score_spread":0.1957050052537517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}