{"id":"W2925877924","doi":"10.1680/jmacr.18.00564","title":"Numerical modelling of interfacial transition zone influence on elastic modulus of concrete","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Magazine of Concrete Research","topic":"Composite Material Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Elastic modulus; Aggregate (composite); Volume fraction; Composite material; Compressive strength; Modulus; Young's modulus; Aggregate modulus; Finite element method; Structural engineering; Dynamic modulus; Dynamic mechanical analysis; Polymer; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000338931,0.000544651,0.0004655573,0.0005208012,0.0003739123,0.0007095498,0.0005328341,0.001024315,0.001150904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009477576,0.0002880657,0.0006381892,0.0004166804,0.0007387165,0.0004575968,0.0004522389,0.0003797755,0.0001804627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004319174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004645692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00590399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003110883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998179,0.0000520998,0.00001238291,0.00002822817,0.00005846731,0.00003081933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996687,0.0001637961,0.00006602189,0.00002891278,0.00005446623,0.00001814667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005223487,0.00003462779,0.001112559,0.00006027945,0.00001224379,0.0001369652,0.00004180456,0.9768472,0.01693196,0.001774881,0.00008367639,0.002911643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003407838,0.0000186145,0.0003342413,0.000004679726,0.000004719328,0.00001224677,0.000008080578,0.9977284,0.001572095,0.0001608162,0.0001480439,0.000004639962],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8378695,0.001170691,0.1342018,0.0002271275,0.0001091325,0.00008438709,0.000210995,0.0003432924,0.02578298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989526,0.0003395556,0.007884491,0.00001175838,0.00001098443,0.00003349846,0.00004351732,0.0000253112,0.002124856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00590399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01173925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02955699582194823,"score_gpt":0.2728744082508685,"score_spread":0.2433174124289203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}