{"id":"W2932089131","doi":"10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.070","title":"Considerations for readdressing theoretical descriptions of particle-reinforced composite food gels","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Food Research International","topic":"biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs","keywords":"Composite number; Particle (ecology); Polymer science; Materials science; Composite material; Chemistry; Chemical engineering; Biology; Engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008392845,0.001790625,0.001956988,0.002338265,0.002795602,0.004740963,0.009736389,0.005666194,0.01348621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0160016,0.0009396775,0.001760879,0.0008033005,0.005364171,0.01060144,0.002531227,0.007193563,0.004026016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002231725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001795177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002075068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002274354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978009,0.0008415111,0.0001983096,0.0001400006,0.0008771134,0.0001421892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924604,0.004151731,0.0003032772,0.001376762,0.001514671,0.0001930774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001999473,0.00005322391,0.00004495126,0.0001947702,0.0000104914,0.0001462822,0.0003856671,0.01078423,0.0008414495,0.975377,0.005655049,0.00648691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002470065,0.00003170704,0.00003028466,0.000194618,0.00001271275,0.0001026269,0.0001877677,0.03930245,0.001026011,0.931118,0.02792498,0.00004409953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02636348,0.01102004,0.7583528,0.06465184,0.008219579,0.0003166207,0.0005284165,0.001973429,0.1285738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3450757,0.01094021,0.5519133,0.01570311,0.006348349,0.002094103,0.0004908183,0.002291419,0.06514296],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01348621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04511583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1582478714317146,"score_gpt":0.3517537628116853,"score_spread":0.1935058913799707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}