{"id":"W2932505663","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2019.03.031","title":"Monitoring ecological recovery of reclaimed wellsites: Protocols for quantifying recovery on forested lands","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MethodsX","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Teck (Canada); Canadian Forest Service; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Land reclamation; Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Sampling (signal processing); Environmental monitoring; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Ecological health; Protocol (science); Ecological indicator; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008522667,0.0001462366,0.0003610825,0.00002380762,0.0002117834,0.00001869815,0.0002249872,0.0002127044,0.0001229015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004043398,0.00005818615,0.0001979721,0.0001925651,0.00006762779,0.00008750111,0.00009346699,0.0001264014,0.00004109038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003308736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006892764,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000239657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004262183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988267,0.0001978605,0.0002399855,0.0003225244,0.0001224595,0.0002904698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974948,0.002166198,0.0001667058,0.00007436366,0.0000547245,0.00004317073],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002073298,0.0004126508,0.8525937,0.0001385097,0.0001415981,0.000004241223,0.0001126385,0.00008400708,0.06075697,0.0001750651,0.001221236,0.08228605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005827712,0.00482561,0.9406479,0.0001336935,0.000027456,0.000001574062,0.0003178288,0.00004419445,0.03900094,0.002235258,0.01192989,0.0002529136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937066,0.00003032422,0.00002842831,0.0004381571,0.0003983616,0.004412015,0.00005794341,0.00005058881,0.0008775912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797274,0.00006751864,0.01697279,0.0002617416,0.0003046003,0.001431225,0.00004406258,0.000002437441,0.001188194],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08805414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2372762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1454316424098876,"score_gpt":0.3442592806844352,"score_spread":0.1988276382745476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}