{"id":"W2932505663","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2019.03.031","title":"Monitoring ecological recovery of reclaimed wellsites: Protocols for quantifying recovery on forested lands","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MethodsX","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Teck (Canada); Canadian Forest Service; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Land reclamation; Environmental science; Vegetation (pathology); Sampling (signal processing); Environmental monitoring; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Ecological health; Protocol (science); Ecological indicator; Ecosystem; Ecology; Environmental engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009520907,0.0009755949,0.0004605475,0.005133811,0.002949888,0.001622342,0.0032152,0.0007541364,0.002451363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00530522,0.0005154022,0.0005035573,0.003660434,0.001670846,0.0009636281,0.001807784,0.0009925001,0.0009506888],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008216056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01336699,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2098679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5173154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.991342,0.001298781,0.001009726,0.0007551152,0.004940675,0.000653796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916048,0.0004284183,0.00145604,0.001152643,0.004952466,0.0004055738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009980263,0.001667778,0.239058,0.00128799,0.000147789,0.0007486293,0.007578605,0.0186884,0.3002847,0.006459151,0.01402815,0.4090527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002588714,0.002179158,0.5764911,0.0006420249,0.0001964702,0.000529381,0.005460843,0.02551501,0.2473193,0.002730323,0.1383187,0.0003588666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.3769542,0.0009976206,0.4523065,0.0005783708,0.0001355359,0.102278,0.01744088,0.002420932,0.04688793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1650999,0.00100908,0.7148396,0.0002631477,0.00003169144,0.09061167,0.01036513,0.0001931956,0.01758664],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2098679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4172927,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1454316424098876,"score_gpt":0.3442592806844352,"score_spread":0.1988276382745476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}