{"id":"W2932534886","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.078","title":"Public preferences for co-benefits of riparian buffer strips in Denmark: An economic valuation study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Region Sjælland; Strategic Innovation Fund; Innovationsfonden","keywords":"Buffer strip; Riparian buffer; Riparian zone; Valuation (finance); Recreation; Buffer zone; Welfare; Buffer (optical fiber); Business; STRIPS; Cost–benefit analysis; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Water quality; Ecology; Computer science; Economics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002026998,0.0002251893,0.0004231615,0.0006911972,0.0006816354,0.002989302,0.0004390464,0.001251724,0.003676973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004791334,0.0003091655,0.0005032024,0.0007764318,0.001067078,0.001360344,0.0009666097,0.000757943,0.0002256725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002993052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008840713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03638121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04209585,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990457,0.0003360825,0.00005172265,0.0001475429,0.0001470116,0.0002720581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943643,0.003802648,0.0009841628,0.0002528695,0.0002421235,0.0003538881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006343162,0.002971208,0.8140325,0.0003049309,0.001159468,0.003318249,0.0127402,0.06076958,0.006054255,0.05344656,0.003790396,0.03506942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003127319,0.0007182,0.8923151,0.0001503611,0.0005177946,0.0005419051,0.03602553,0.04660025,0.001698227,0.01377381,0.007191414,0.0001546586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970025,0.0001185631,0.0001799257,0.00009710189,0.000002323644,0.00000499521,0.0001208557,0.000001400257,0.00247225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994895,0.00003630324,0.00004535625,0.000006285903,0.000001131326,0.000001474673,0.00004785004,8.003711e-7,0.0003712217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03638121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07233888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1581001575587311,"score_gpt":0.2429863266673046,"score_spread":0.0848861691085735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}