{"id":"W2933503571","doi":"","title":"Controversial science exhibitions: Deconstructing public engagement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Visitor pattern; Exhibition; Science communication; Introspection; Public engagement; Narrative; Public awareness of science; Active listening; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Cognitive dissonance; Personalization; Visual arts; Psychology; Science education; Public relations; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Art; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Communication; Cognitive psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02711868,0.0009628609,0.0006785512,0.005233643,0.01626682,0.02118481,0.0034582,0.004504151,0.004321716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03289197,0.0009253272,0.001063755,0.004058401,0.04834006,0.01753951,0.02693004,0.005233623,0.0004783055],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007139348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005253122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006045837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008068305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9586546,0.03409514,0.0006274308,0.001690673,0.002355237,0.002577006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9463538,0.0420615,0.003246881,0.005142998,0.001468518,0.001726239],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000352025,0.00001450426,0.001979609,0.00008508139,0.00001053762,0.0004864888,0.9719596,0.0001159378,0.0003056413,0.01969174,0.0004250069,0.004890697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008046778,0.00003916195,0.001838587,0.0002275897,0.00001673515,0.0004161298,0.9434615,0.0003369951,0.0004284078,0.01093906,0.04226588,0.00002194043],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8720052,0.001929302,0.02284701,0.01268123,0.0001726133,0.0001970111,0.0001507307,0.0001835637,0.08983325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950711,0.0003710644,0.001838142,0.0002660031,0.00003752571,0.00008344536,0.00004668961,0.0000659315,0.002220263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.143419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08653529968549473,"score_gpt":0.2812716839726339,"score_spread":0.1947363842871392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}