{"id":"W2935959749","doi":"10.1017/s0016756817000656","title":"<i>Treptichnus pedum</i>and the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary: significance and caveats","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geological Magazine","topic":"Geological formations and processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geology; Facies; Trace fossil; Paleontology; Intertidal zone; Ordovician; Ichnology; Confusion; Oceanography; Structural basin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003776029,0.0001442336,0.0002310708,0.00001887497,0.001177397,0.0003697399,0.0003117934,0.00009272102,0.001528815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005451938,0.00007094764,0.00003593783,0.00004606524,0.001444528,0.0002338713,0.00007537963,0.0001918983,0.0002420871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":8.634445e-7,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001727769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005731968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001072537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990413,0.00007583392,0.0001823693,0.000261393,0.000144029,0.0002950987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990939,0.0003354585,0.0001119936,0.0002822446,0.00004433932,0.0001321032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002000389,0.00001240317,0.9316041,0.00003205533,0.00001376582,0.00002390658,0.0001150678,0.00003772516,0.000006174947,0.005760974,0.0004474673,0.06174634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006533154,0.0001279833,0.9500529,0.00000674464,0.00001878414,0.00005297117,0.00003415226,0.001353814,0.000003015291,0.01958946,0.02798338,0.0001234533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9353662,0.002620933,0.00008760837,0.009158763,0.0001884803,0.0002451579,0.00003929496,0.00004587264,0.05224771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960135,0.001346669,0.0003957881,0.000683225,0.0001312478,0.000005060293,0.00002064708,0.000001402593,0.001402465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06162288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0149541583378912,"score_gpt":0.2211820603859139,"score_spread":0.2062279020480227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}