{"id":"W2936669955","doi":"10.1116/1.5089919","title":"On the optimum off-cut angle for the growth on InP(111)B substrates by molecular beam epitaxy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Nanotechnology and Microelectronics Materials Processing Measurement and Phenomena","topic":"Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo; Ontario Centres of Excellence","keywords":"Hillock; Materials science; Vicinal; Molecular beam epitaxy; Differential interference contrast microscopy; Epitaxy; Misorientation; Optoelectronics; Wafer; Microscopy; Optics; Nanotechnology; Composite material; Layer (electronics); Chemistry; Microstructure","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002175295,0.0004311919,0.0003050065,0.0001908767,0.0001948793,0.0004179809,0.0002390875,0.0002743642,0.001910536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003919958,0.0002400324,0.00008592311,0.0001993062,0.0001229048,0.0002348674,0.0001787636,0.0003230109,0.000606867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000179535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002815435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004994593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001280565,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997776,0.00003119439,0.0000149349,0.0000615676,0.0000690794,0.00004562949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996381,0.0001105407,0.00009802956,0.00002269866,0.00008309147,0.00004756603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001820144,0.00001559554,0.0008839794,0.00007038648,0.000002684389,0.00004225906,0.0000164522,0.0002196114,0.9961848,0.0001775921,0.0001537771,0.002050803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002236902,0.0001550396,0.01126827,0.00003462376,0.00001670465,0.0001385072,0.00005640437,0.00197903,0.9827394,0.0001075211,0.003468702,0.00001334875],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845599,0.001898217,0.006684177,0.0001768308,0.000060555,0.00004190057,0.0006326978,0.0001155751,0.005830145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879236,0.001328089,0.008653005,0.00005794894,0.00001552181,0.00003379645,0.0005305522,0.00007542327,0.001382109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001910536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006391406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00884395382628929,"score_gpt":0.2225098613822794,"score_spread":0.2136659075559901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}