{"id":"W2936701616","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v8n3p46","title":"An Essential Analogy Between Coherent Previsions of Random Gains and Well-Behaved Preferences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Mathematics; Analogy; Mathematical economics; Decision maker; Regular polygon; Expected utility hypothesis; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006027754,0.0007430369,0.0009010204,0.001644239,0.0006717805,0.004502037,0.001272377,0.001290421,0.002994644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123502,0.0005114321,0.001416153,0.001551529,0.005792481,0.008693231,0.002502564,0.003423028,0.0003379635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001173599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006935651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003730133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000262923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942986,0.002509604,0.0003120657,0.0009131111,0.00162748,0.0003390757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927401,0.003867684,0.00104717,0.001193484,0.0007879893,0.0003636256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007766063,0.00001088165,0.0001281145,0.00002409926,0.00001930588,0.00003812819,0.0001073685,0.002129948,0.0004209751,0.9948179,0.0001310147,0.002164454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006979774,0.00002810047,0.0001631708,0.00001225778,0.00000822897,0.00004850661,0.0000318647,0.009188886,0.0002045249,0.9893547,0.000941405,0.00001143301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04574491,0.000628174,0.9337358,0.001663911,0.00009525951,0.00006139622,0.0001501933,0.00005999915,0.01786035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7996921,0.0007383376,0.1952942,0.0005752537,0.0002873916,0.0002714655,0.000130449,0.00006589074,0.002944886],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006027754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03187823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08372914305427011,"score_gpt":0.4154550330500134,"score_spread":0.3317258899957433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}