{"id":"W2937202072","doi":"10.2749/vancouver.2017.2285","title":"The dynamic evaluation of composite materials footbridges","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Report","topic":"Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Structural dynamics; Natural frequency; Vibration; Structural engineering; Modal; Modal analysis; Dynamic load testing; Acceleration; Pedestrian; Dynamic testing; Dynamic loading; Traffic volume; Computer science; Engineering; Civil engineering; Finite element method; Transport engineering; Physics; Acoustics; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005226969,0.0004672351,0.0002652493,0.00154275,0.0003340126,0.000545865,0.0003151486,0.0005797858,0.003222316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007190611,0.0001956316,0.0002449735,0.0005742813,0.0004069989,0.0002844615,0.0003534288,0.0002588826,0.0003482613],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003123927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000202596,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000885098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001615009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995685,0.00004053268,0.00001405731,0.00005466881,0.0002822784,0.00003994262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996552,0.00009291207,0.0000473627,0.00003214757,0.0001455024,0.00002689198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003255722,0.0001131949,0.003621882,0.0002881254,0.00002366063,0.0007919181,0.0004764375,0.06199967,0.8742277,0.001728639,0.0004924056,0.05591078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003722766,0.002662086,0.0865263,0.0001610077,0.000104143,0.001886828,0.001506965,0.2919267,0.581648,0.002043157,0.03137254,0.0001251373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529582,0.0006320761,0.03610327,0.00005297191,0.00007804669,0.00007420286,0.000262474,0.000124356,0.009714459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898141,0.0002088023,0.006384972,0.00001842369,0.000008176828,0.00002695235,0.0001509496,0.00001758113,0.003370178],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003222316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01077974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01872077128892801,"score_gpt":0.2952220273309415,"score_spread":0.2765012560420135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}