{"id":"W2937202072","doi":"10.2749/vancouver.2017.2285","title":"The dynamic evaluation of composite materials footbridges","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Report","topic":"Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Structural dynamics; Natural frequency; Vibration; Structural engineering; Modal; Modal analysis; Dynamic load testing; Acceleration; Pedestrian; Dynamic testing; Dynamic loading; Traffic volume; Computer science; Engineering; Civil engineering; Finite element method; Transport engineering; Physics; Acoustics; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037458,0.00004559438,0.00007986633,0.0000167631,0.0001102441,0.00005466658,0.00008972985,0.00001913906,0.00002058241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007438145,0.00003241414,0.00002927922,0.00001727715,0.00002461919,0.00005008395,0.00001058295,0.00002079945,0.000003130379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002451188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008101549,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002392921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001017483,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999541,0.000008659705,0.0001719268,0.00004898845,0.0001737236,0.00005566564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994581,0.00001104743,0.00008208541,0.0003630293,0.00007253935,0.00001314202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000492283,0.000005343361,0.001075796,0.0000585148,0.0003299424,0.0000143537,0.0000789377,0.3515944,0.5645323,0.0004484693,0.0003701659,0.08148687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001375616,0.00000595817,0.2546306,0.00001827579,0.0001143132,0.00006430947,0.00001808565,0.5238454,0.2201198,0.0002574912,0.0006843153,0.000103832],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932209,0.0001259006,0.003870068,0.00005588418,0.0004496404,0.00005330623,0.000002450529,0.00005452941,0.002167344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997131,0.00002622341,0.00009802818,7.386132e-7,0.00002185929,0.000005649194,0.00001014728,0.000006764395,0.0001175108],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3444124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.132181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01872077128892801,"score_gpt":0.2952220273309415,"score_spread":0.2765012560420135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}