{"id":"W2937261171","doi":"10.3390/g10020019","title":"Ideal Reactive Equilibrium","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Ideal (ethics); Subgame; Nash equilibrium; Perfection; Trembling hand perfect equilibrium; Sequential equilibrium; Complete information; Equilibrium selection; Extensive-form game; Markov perfect equilibrium; Computer science; Economics; Epsilon-equilibrium; Game theory; Best response; Sequential game; Epistemology; Repeated game; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004058006,0.0009502242,0.0006994395,0.001325811,0.00130308,0.002695884,0.002445291,0.00158646,0.0105129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006228861,0.0003363573,0.001306387,0.0007722743,0.004948237,0.005471656,0.003106856,0.002937252,0.002267879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002312825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002352975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001480911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00141929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953607,0.001519955,0.0002858095,0.001064353,0.001342166,0.0004270283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972274,0.0008258801,0.0003405098,0.000519353,0.0008358508,0.0002511015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009550899,0.000006998557,0.00003170142,0.00001794254,0.000005291688,0.00001428204,0.00005067529,0.0009529896,0.0001861679,0.9954868,0.0005939554,0.002643693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002015934,0.00003776512,0.0000677631,0.0000297105,0.000009566937,0.00007656445,0.00005834585,0.01238863,0.0007478527,0.9628132,0.02372981,0.00002065312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007217983,0.0004316179,0.8303275,0.001507803,0.0003416574,0.0002170284,0.000210216,0.0002810507,0.1594652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5544713,0.001268336,0.3882779,0.001883592,0.0004290949,0.001034599,0.0004975813,0.0002069971,0.05193064],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03516924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06814157462283109,"score_gpt":0.3783683144727049,"score_spread":0.3102267398498738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}