{"id":"W2937376009","doi":"10.1002/edn3.7","title":"Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Biology; Relative species abundance; Natural (archaeology); Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002886056,0.0003659027,0.0007858302,0.0001334538,0.00009684708,0.00001582632,0.0004326439,0.0001630888,0.01236233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005090541,0.000348182,0.000630482,0.0003384711,0.0003412675,0.0002398782,0.0004684924,0.0002426632,0.000861063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006191119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001625927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007283411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000341773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974394,0.00006241344,0.0005088336,0.0007813447,0.00071671,0.000491308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989008,0.0001220802,0.0002541756,0.0006269669,9.75564e-7,0.00009502155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004413198,0.0003342058,0.9437253,0.00001824336,0.0046203,0.000007568327,0.0008341265,0.001237183,0.04867626,0.000009349251,0.0002889203,0.000204423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006970053,0.0001553129,0.9535154,0.000007250228,0.005077156,0.000001467353,0.001214526,0.00005998528,0.02903327,0.0000655366,0.009739973,0.0004331241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994649,0.001354055,0.00004872713,0.0002158866,0.0002239264,0.0008783305,0.0001560042,0.00001885537,0.002455225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903914,0.0004488568,0.004827253,0.00007285909,0.00002921927,0.00007268788,0.00005713128,0.00002861259,0.004071992],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01964299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02011396674511366,"score_gpt":0.2217362322353749,"score_spread":0.2016222654902612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}