{"id":"W2937376009","doi":"10.1002/edn3.7","title":"Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":281,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biomass (ecology); Ecology; Biology; Relative species abundance; Natural (archaeology); Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05583204,0.002303325,0.005536356,0.007413245,0.0007953141,0.004665273,0.003551753,0.002298261,0.006882917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1234101,0.001029565,0.02064403,0.008102325,0.0009746756,0.003694516,0.002520499,0.003013887,0.0006776265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001256658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002057855,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004483378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007831846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9594039,0.0264374,0.003684801,0.007575534,0.002281202,0.0006170786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.847734,0.1230561,0.007249918,0.01603547,0.004787587,0.001136808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00124984,0.00008773933,0.1349575,0.03843235,0.7488237,0.0005537174,0.0004268656,0.007820324,0.003635354,0.005575818,0.005740074,0.05269669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005617781,0.0006630835,0.122739,0.0122875,0.7715388,0.0004996484,0.0005811609,0.02234286,0.003382614,0.03022183,0.03491337,0.00026834],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.139537,0.4654996,0.3326184,0.01402502,0.004714455,0.0008336806,0.0329864,0.002507069,0.007278582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8391533,0.0270943,0.1175159,0.004585022,0.0008703701,0.0008528756,0.007856097,0.0008918899,0.001180306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05583204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2952716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02011396674511366,"score_gpt":0.2217362322353749,"score_spread":0.2016222654902612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}