{"id":"W2938215043","doi":"","title":"Thirty-one Years of the Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science: A Content Analysis / Trente et un ans de la Revue canadienne des sciences de l'information et de bibliothéconomie : une analyse de contenu","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Educational Research and Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Information science; Content analysis; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Art; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007706863,0.0003560267,0.0006846256,0.02094527,0.008895991,0.009529783,0.001726486,0.001152046,0.005454505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03362488,0.0005989641,0.0004537105,0.03802069,0.00439476,0.004422779,0.00558428,0.001527512,0.0007013184],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02890695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1003428,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8570367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9420072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9907954,0.0008590993,0.0008800931,0.00066186,0.005585616,0.001217973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536358,0.009139043,0.006768032,0.001200346,0.02108211,0.008174552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001965732,0.0001038642,0.5061565,0.001293907,0.0001386389,0.0006864672,0.3534527,0.0001218742,0.0007324433,0.007929505,0.02363703,0.1055505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004125589,0.00003097868,0.7436371,0.0007059943,0.00003975379,0.0001137849,0.1459132,0.00005854802,0.0001677302,0.0003412317,0.1089215,0.00006610354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.897644,0.03085043,0.0003441746,0.01375009,0.0006394717,0.0003172073,0.01314751,0.00004339733,0.04326367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965385,0.0170242,0.0005769403,0.001045202,0.0002011217,0.0002206318,0.004966064,0.00005287375,0.01052785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2876105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04540445771806025,"score_gpt":0.295717665721302,"score_spread":0.2503132080032418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}