{"id":"W2938251468","doi":"10.1007/s11229-019-02191-z","title":"How to identify wholes with their parts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plural; Contradiction; Philosophy of language; Nothing; Metaphysics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Word (group theory); Philosophy; Mereology; Philosophy of science; Computer science; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002011434,0.00009190611,0.0001131461,0.00003495116,0.0000355067,0.00006090568,0.0002824718,0.00004338695,0.001132286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005129114,0.00005564707,0.00003183506,0.0001602706,0.0001271288,0.00008891054,0.00004576644,0.00007899135,0.002603489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008182399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006880878,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009505658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006029837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991933,0.00006694123,0.00005883528,0.0002831552,0.0001318906,0.0002658638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992511,0.0001538478,0.0000228915,0.0004226988,0.00001960906,0.0001298177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001023642,0.00007947758,0.002566125,0.00000565491,0.00002597963,0.00002170525,0.001577208,0.000002930041,0.004043816,0.9812862,0.0003792063,0.009909377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008432958,0.001012674,0.09438986,0.0002521382,0.00003484286,0.0000884862,0.004469651,0.00003148084,0.02349659,0.7475709,0.1268192,0.0009908547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6994894,0.00003034397,0.0004831702,0.007886087,0.0003118935,0.0001736557,0.000008935434,0.00004698776,0.2915695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956812,4.876927e-7,0.00006402606,0.0004988502,0.00008832007,0.00002217204,5.049867e-7,0.000009571054,0.003634813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2961919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02318192182830387,"score_gpt":0.2998944594826811,"score_spread":0.2767125376543773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}