{"id":"W2938667012","doi":"10.1101/602516","title":"Within-family studies for Mendelian randomization: avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Medical Research Council; Fakultet for medisin og helsevitenskap, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet; Norwegian Institute of Public Health; National Institutes of Health; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney; Karolinska Institutet; Istituto Superiore di Sanità; University of Melbourne; University of Exeter; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute; St. Olavs Hospital Universitetssykehuset i Trondheim; Norges Forskningsråd; Academy of Finland; Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen; Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet; Université Laval; School of Public Health, University of Michigan; Universidad de Murcia; Wellcome Trust; Helse Midt-Norge; University of Bristol","keywords":"Mendelian randomization; Assortative mating; Population stratification; Population; Mendelian inheritance; Causal inference; Demography; Randomization; Offspring; Biology; Genetics; Econometrics; Genotype; Bioinformatics; Genetic variants; Clinical trial; Mathematics; Gene; Pregnancy; Single-nucleotide polymorphism","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001172095,0.0003833014,0.0005922233,0.0001211839,0.0002827392,0.00008894369,0.0001686705,0.0004964667,0.000002162122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003445097,0.000392679,0.0001135211,0.0001184667,0.00007431427,0.00001171083,0.0001717386,0.0002320361,0.00000341327],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009587246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002200841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003325558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001407524,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976702,0.0003283935,0.0006988909,0.000844463,0.0001505241,0.0003075785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997477,0.0002835763,0.0009204696,0.0005188663,0.0007098172,0.00009030288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001954064,0.00008190527,0.0545907,0.0005914058,0.001007972,9.545079e-7,0.00008842366,0.01536309,0.9259201,0.001030901,0.001117948,0.00001119991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007193733,0.0007119718,0.7829697,0.001098688,0.001179973,8.000049e-8,0.0005505394,0.0423482,0.1600221,0.0002293449,0.0010013,0.002694483],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583255,0.002872787,0.03614428,0.0001684705,0.0008701375,0.001273573,0.0002886482,0.0000514561,0.000005127636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792961,0.0007868016,0.01889493,0.0001529348,0.0003568182,0.000393953,0.00003205722,0.00006755494,0.0000187838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.765898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03675634253249403,"score_gpt":0.2898627469842556,"score_spread":0.2531064044517616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}