{"id":"W2939535658","doi":"10.1093/gigascience/giz029","title":"An efficient and robust laboratory workflow and tetrapod database for larger scale environmental DNA studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GigaScience","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Natural Environment Research Council; State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution; Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Bureau of International Cooperation, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Frauen; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; Sight Research UK; Groninger Universiteitsfonds","keywords":"Amplicon; Environmental DNA; Database; Computational biology; Biology; Computer science; Pipeline (software); Workflow; Taxonomic rank; Annotation; DNA extraction; Polymerase chain reaction; Data mining; Genetics; Gene; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006714496,0.001590868,0.001557847,0.003124234,0.00127735,0.003001826,0.003558723,0.001131553,0.01544977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008855785,0.001155191,0.001491104,0.002468077,0.0004567735,0.002435819,0.003706189,0.001793542,0.02085458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001063175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00412242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001795433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002843816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951093,0.0006793996,0.0008426351,0.001884816,0.001209081,0.0002748837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928274,0.0007432912,0.0007813929,0.002865118,0.002182791,0.0006000026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001743873,0.0004860029,0.01093175,0.002305782,0.0003463598,0.0006249301,0.0005019406,0.004200509,0.418867,0.004324679,0.09076715,0.4648999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005252296,0.0008970376,0.03389085,0.0008463126,0.0003985955,0.001710535,0.000548943,0.06140566,0.3657936,0.01696729,0.5164967,0.0005192704],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01502107,0.0008290926,0.8348367,0.0006560292,0.0003399831,0.002254868,0.04414066,0.09767213,0.004249533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01964061,0.0003197672,0.9126127,0.0003968191,0.00007920752,0.002130319,0.05947199,0.003518888,0.001829808],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01544977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05168462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01267283481908421,"score_gpt":0.2201085039917249,"score_spread":0.2074356691726407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}