{"id":"W2939895006","doi":"10.29329/ijpe.2019.189.4","title":"Analysis of Scientific Studies on Item Response Theory by Bibliometric Analysis Method","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Progressive Education","topic":"Problem Solving Skills Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Item response theory; Rasch model; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Classical test theory; Citation; Reliability (semiconductor); Bibliometrics; China; Web of science; Statistics; Psychology; Social science; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Mathematics; History; MEDLINE; Political science; Archaeology; Psychometrics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008279264,0.0001625773,0.0006193887,0.08959725,0.0001637072,0.00005671983,0.0006987829,0.0001040746,0.0007365568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006952982,0.0001271608,0.0003811908,0.06416088,0.00009234111,0.0003166285,0.0001243185,0.0003838545,0.00005772014],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008430965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001566323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001186153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006723473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947506,0.00185236,0.001438548,0.000309243,0.00142151,0.0002277335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841439,0.005504496,0.003329289,0.000322944,0.006591015,0.0001083394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001427016,0.0008317772,0.9239757,0.00005640562,0.02780063,0.000005405561,0.008717412,0.0008536092,0.003253954,0.001519581,0.006729004,0.02482947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008017074,0.0002669065,0.9803641,0.0007191779,0.003700308,0.000004778376,0.006840894,0.0004371109,0.002746131,0.001688285,0.002205933,0.0002245939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884716,0.002501083,0.001618638,0.001429623,0.005394707,0.0003252664,0.00004433641,0.00001199078,0.0002027089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902987,0.00009687042,0.00622754,0.0003317492,0.0001399668,0.00004002275,0.0000688298,0.00001434799,0.00278198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05638845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9557309,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05012513684512344,"score_gpt":0.5213276930313959,"score_spread":0.4712025561862725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}