{"id":"W2939895006","doi":"10.29329/ijpe.2019.189.4","title":"Analysis of Scientific Studies on Item Response Theory by Bibliometric Analysis Method","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Progressive Education","topic":"Problem Solving Skills Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Item response theory; Rasch model; Field (mathematics); Citation analysis; Classical test theory; Citation; Reliability (semiconductor); Bibliometrics; China; Web of science; Statistics; Psychology; Social science; Computer science; Library science; Sociology; Mathematics; History; MEDLINE; Political science; Archaeology; Psychometrics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0928222,0.001430359,0.003350051,0.08983865,0.001330355,0.005772423,0.001860047,0.001309855,0.007014475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2784643,0.0005240863,0.005128133,0.1074408,0.001681873,0.004847277,0.00316626,0.001128918,0.001292419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002701759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004455455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009682665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008477774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8369216,0.0784793,0.03128209,0.005294126,0.04684515,0.001177729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5868562,0.3262798,0.03057255,0.01317133,0.04222659,0.0008934213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006358453,0.0007757518,0.4618638,0.03886046,0.007191178,0.0006415178,0.01266487,0.005215209,0.002735759,0.01320276,0.01085661,0.4453562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004696761,0.003213358,0.7678955,0.01554066,0.009371798,0.001622167,0.03542807,0.02195573,0.007508507,0.02888291,0.1076487,0.0004629575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5931433,0.04066249,0.2077436,0.003172699,0.001305631,0.03147234,0.03708329,0.001399018,0.08401752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8031705,0.009831953,0.1343734,0.000424579,0.0006144241,0.03672994,0.01227057,0.0002161354,0.002368568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9101614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4908966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05012513684512344,"score_gpt":0.5213276930313959,"score_spread":0.4712025561862725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}