{"id":"W2940835312","doi":"10.24095/hpcdp.39.4.06","title":"Evidence synthesis - Evaluating risk communication during extreme weather and climate change: a scoping review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; Extreme weather; Climate change; Scopus; Grey literature; Risk communication; Public health; Business; MEDLINE; Political science; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Geography; Medicine; Environmental health; Environmental science; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00275287,0.0002177505,0.0006981134,0.0001037908,0.0006189139,0.00008006414,0.0002314182,0.00005537218,0.0002625894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003256387,0.0002075095,0.00008358568,0.0002965738,0.00007706949,0.0004010162,0.0001736789,0.0002141862,0.000006250346],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001772479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00637718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1787979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8255537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950604,0.002828474,0.0007178889,0.0004660009,0.0004922668,0.0004350133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982477,0.0002337417,0.0008712438,0.0003506415,0.00003897989,0.0002577021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001986322,0.00001901704,0.0002505317,0.2526288,0.000007905543,9.078735e-7,0.000139984,3.934639e-7,2.604837e-9,0.0000779483,0.00002683538,0.7468457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001532086,0.00002751829,0.001123329,0.9855219,0.0003885045,7.626728e-7,0.0002174067,0.00008750168,4.591534e-9,0.00004049655,0.01219536,0.0002439812],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001644674,0.9930351,0.000004592905,0.001089154,0.0001365912,0.00536329,0.00001894581,0.00002117868,0.0001666489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001106976,0.9972509,0.00002409232,0.00006751469,0.00006525826,0.001240413,0.00001784983,0.0000184957,0.0002084635],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7466016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2537285534576605,"score_gpt":0.4688976169846333,"score_spread":0.2151690635269728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}