{"id":"W2941258589","doi":"10.1088/1367-2630/ab2d3a","title":"Efficient verification of bosonic quantum channels via benchmarking","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Journal of Physics","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Unitary state; Benchmark (surveying); Quantum; Gaussian; Set (abstract data type); Fidelity; Channel (broadcasting); POVM; Quantum state","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002635116,0.00007560971,0.0001664519,0.0001088684,0.00002980912,0.00004439208,0.0004684785,0.00002889771,0.00001929028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005871024,0.00006517502,0.0001476243,0.0004272739,0.00001594715,0.000337061,0.0000390757,0.0001249477,0.00003461339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001980001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001108185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003856603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.64613e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989845,0.0000248016,0.000406091,0.0000734425,0.0003883753,0.0001228047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987864,0.00003325448,0.00066816,0.0002368442,0.0002019849,0.00007328765],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003935928,0.0002717257,0.0008285346,0.0001190566,0.00009639316,0.000002032223,0.005489587,0.09052044,0.02938912,0.735096,0.001053639,0.1370941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009389107,0.0005116853,0.002312692,0.0001664596,0.00001611046,0.00002708143,0.0000985902,0.9363769,0.03007704,0.02772831,0.001560755,0.0001854306],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3282444,0.00006454132,0.6704915,0.00009864601,0.0006725747,0.00005137418,2.7052e-7,0.00000831247,0.0003683387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943293,0.00001285603,0.005390348,0.00007726885,0.000178771,2.417944e-7,4.607962e-7,0.000003614205,0.000007152316],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8458565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.265776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01211466292600349,"score_gpt":0.2304892742317147,"score_spread":0.2183746113057112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}