{"id":"W2941607365","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1347","title":"Daniels v. Canada: Reflections on Constitutional Technique","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Originalism; Certainty; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02181131,0.0007086847,0.001060672,0.006057281,0.03022416,0.02023898,0.006725282,0.01233543,0.005332592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0336998,0.0008206,0.00118324,0.007577008,0.08470025,0.00728189,0.005367627,0.02262566,0.0005267268],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1730742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1741556,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9418102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.943904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9680244,0.008518528,0.001000689,0.003510987,0.01270287,0.006242528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867077,0.008141515,0.000433342,0.0007659503,0.00325512,0.0006964061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002761298,0.000001823979,0.00006180768,0.00001561388,0.00000222241,0.00003347353,0.001707885,0.00005689415,0.00001988542,0.991531,0.00517209,0.001394645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003640018,0.00001394706,0.001132316,0.0006606767,0.0000345558,0.0001159297,0.008426739,0.000523184,0.0003749717,0.5344264,0.4541602,0.00009459954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0168243,0.03455824,0.01026334,0.2621829,0.00281566,0.0001541371,0.0005587129,0.0001209179,0.6725218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7705462,0.02508995,0.0121873,0.1010889,0.002245632,0.0003629509,0.0003133051,0.0002098674,0.08795596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1730742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9591168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1059334931822901,"score_gpt":0.3992322901122735,"score_spread":0.2932987969299835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}