{"id":"W2941607365","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1347","title":"Daniels v. Canada: Reflections on Constitutional Technique","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Originalism; Certainty; Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005936965,0.0001346603,0.0002786304,0.000006959563,0.004773308,0.00009350218,0.0004658941,0.00006664132,0.0004200504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009434767,0.0001064904,0.00009556844,0.00006354494,0.001434999,0.0002030956,0.0000791218,0.0001992981,0.00006554304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006032962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006843698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7134693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9099478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986096,0.000147495,0.0002144309,0.0002278358,0.0005070772,0.0002935541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990295,0.00008808827,0.0001588396,0.0003513492,0.0002447334,0.0001275135],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001302397,0.00001843743,0.0001236571,0.0001136944,0.00002590639,0.000007005028,0.0001049258,3.973173e-7,0.00003446877,0.9291252,0.0699073,0.0005377206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005542832,0.00001053719,0.000448787,0.001254634,0.00003034828,0.000002051703,0.00005960567,1.195766e-7,0.00005198654,0.0006420027,0.997298,0.0001465259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008184135,0.01121243,0.00008894541,0.06312058,0.0007310024,0.002023427,0.00005421354,0.0001122156,0.9225754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356458,0.04419612,0.001053372,0.0103474,0.0008943548,0.0009518103,0.00001769598,0.0000166321,0.006876795],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1059334931822901,"score_gpt":0.3992322901122735,"score_spread":0.2932987969299835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}