{"id":"W2942753117","doi":"10.1017/cem.2019.246","title":"P055: Quality assessment and improvement evaluation of return visits to the emergency department for ultrasound","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Ultrasound in Clinical Applications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Emergency department; Presentation (obstetrics); Ultrasound; Retrospective cohort study; Emergency medicine; Audit; Pelvis; Surgery; Radiology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04058429,0.0007014661,0.001208596,0.002214392,0.001275307,0.002878553,0.001997559,0.001273279,0.007776654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1361176,0.0004515873,0.004218077,0.00362789,0.0005507336,0.001846687,0.003231271,0.001626387,0.001309924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006833107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02234913,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02592911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02792241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9480352,0.02692729,0.008615755,0.001838768,0.01280183,0.001781071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.886875,0.03935453,0.02049172,0.004515745,0.04149261,0.00727039],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007348488,0.002319795,0.4978811,0.005010746,0.003157706,0.0001436735,0.001207398,0.002330952,0.0003531247,0.001641793,0.0756085,0.4029967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001602907,0.004358838,0.9577961,0.002745715,0.001246152,0.0001573567,0.0008868629,0.00731521,0.001199177,0.0006206752,0.02197531,0.0000957531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7283546,0.01181189,0.04093553,0.03287828,0.002554172,0.03237932,0.0889187,0.002274973,0.05989254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8776628,0.001818353,0.07666373,0.002514881,0.0003729573,0.0121079,0.02550197,0.0001807207,0.003176595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04058429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2146328,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1923676012820433,"score_gpt":0.4800788659680602,"score_spread":0.2877112646860168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}